Obama Establishes A New Islamist Government In Libya Paving The Way For The Muslim Caliphate And Armageddon


By Walid Shoebat

Obama’s government two weeks ago just shipped to Libya a new government via a boat. Now the U.S. and other world powers are prepared to help train and arm forces from this new unity government in Libya to supposedly help fight ISIS which has spread rapidly in the turbulent North African nation. As the L.A Times puts it:

The fledgling government, which arrived by boat from neighboring Tunisia on March 31, “is the only entity that can unify the country,” Kerry said. “It is the only way to generate the cohesion necessary to defeat” Islamic State.

“Government which arrived by boat from neighboring Tunisia on March 31”?

Whats next. Shipping governments via UPS and FedEx? The U.S. under Obama shipped the last revolution via Twitter to Egypt to only be taken over by the Muslim Brotherhood. But thank God for Al-Sisi it was put on hold, temporarily of course. Now we are shipping governments even Muslims are being shipped by land and sea.

Then we have all the deception and coverup on how we are being geared towards World War III. The way the wise analyses the media these days is through an urban dictionary. When we read that the government is “vetting” it really means “Muslims slipping through the cracks,” when we read that NATO powers are establishing “interim governments” this would mean “a stepping stone towards a Caliphate”. When we read the word “moderate” it really means “Muslims practicing Taqiyya, Kittman and Muruna”. When we read “aid” it would mean “sending Muslim terrorists weapons”. When we read “refugees” it would mean “Muslim terrorists, but by the ship load instead of just small cells”. When we read “monitoring terrorist groups,” this really means “never let a disaster go to waste”. When we read “reconciliation talks,” this would mean “seeing how Islamist factions would unite for a greater Caliphate” and when we read “Twitter” this would mean “expect a revolution and a takeover soon”.

The Muslim is smart. No wonder Erdogan of Turkey once banned Twitter.

Perhaps first a quick crash course on Libya is necessary to understand what we are doing there and how we got into this mess. It all initially started from an x-Gitmo detainee, the Muslim Brotherhood and Muslim terrorist Force 17, all unleashed by NATO. We extensively exposed this during the Benghazi fiasco. The United States then supported these scum-buckets to oust Qaddafi letting them loose to sprout causing all the mayhem in both Egypt and Libya where Obama aided the Muslim Brotherhood which is now parked in Turkey.

With Islamist help, the United Nations then through NATO had imposed an arms embargo in 2011 to stop strongman Moammar Gadhafi from securing weapons to quell the Islamist uprising against him. He was killed in October of that year. Everyone knows of the famous photo when Gadhafi was gored in his anus where Huma Abedin, Hillary’s assistant couldn’t wait to show her boss the gore photos.


So now there is no central government in Libya, let alone a national military force.

Turkey got involved in the Libyan problem with an approach that received support from the United States, Germany and the United Kingdom under the guise of “monitoring terrorist groups” (we all know what that means) and to supposedly “encouraging reconciliation talks” (see our urban dictionary above to know what that means) between the competing governments in Tripoli and Tobruk.

All this did was that in 2014, Libya experienced a second civil war that left it with two rival governments: one was Islamist-leaning, the General National Congress in Tripoli and western Libya, and the other secular: the internationally-recognized House of Representatives in the city of Tobruk in eastern Libya.

So Tripoli is Islamist globalist leaning (bad guys) and Tobruk is secularist tribalist nationalist leaning (good guys).

Map by Liying Qian (Source material: Wikipedia)

This new GNA government that was shipped by boat on March 30, 2016 arrived in the Libyan capital of Tripoli where the Islamist have a high majority. This new shipped group of Libyan lawmakers are led by a novice politician named Fayez al-Sarraj who had previously been based in Tunisia. The GNA was the result of UN efforts to supposedly find a resolution between the warring factions and to create what they call “a unity government”. The principle obstacles to the success of a unity government continue to include concerns about GNC politicians’ links to Salafist militias and demands by GNC allies to exclude Libyan secularist Army General Khalifa Haftar, the Tobruk-backed former Qaddafi loyalist, from the new government. What further complicates the struggle is the presence of the self-proclaimed Islamic State ISIS established in several coastal areas and cities.

General Haftar was the one who wanted the Islamist out. He began Operation Dignity with an initial focus on attacking Islamist militant groups in Benghazi which is countered by an alliance of Islamists and militias which formed Libya Dawn. The conflict pits the Islamist Libya Dawn coalition, which controls Tripoli and much of western Libya, against the Dignity coalition under Haftar controlling parts of Cyrenaica and Benghazi in eastern Libya. Each coalition had its own self-declared parliament and government, as well as nominal military chiefs, and faces further internal fragmentation and divisions among different groups.

Then we have Ansar al-Sharia—the Libyan terrorist group responsible for the U.S. consulate attack— and the Islamic State, which has gained significant territory in Libya. Taking advantage of the widespread political instability, jihadists are using the country as a hub to coordinate broader regional violence and launch attacks.


So not only do we have ISIS to worry about, but this injection of weapons to the GNA by the U.S. is likely to amplify factional rivalries even further.

Haftar wants to completely dismantle the Libyan branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, as well as what he considers to be any other Islamist terrorist organizations within Libya. Logically he should be the ideal U.S. ally but he is not supported by the U.S. and instead the U.S. supports the bad guys, as usual these days.

So in summary, the NATO powers that got rid of Moammar Gadhafi and prevented him from arming, then installed the pro-Islamist government which was unanimously endorsed by the United Nations Security Council. This Tripoli government of course got the support of Turkey.

20 Vultures from 20 nations in Vienna discussing what to do about Libya. Notice the ceiling with angels.

Now comes the U.S. madness. One would think that the U.S. should support Haftar. No. Just as they did in Syria and in Egypt, the U.S. is supporting the Islamists. John Kerry argues that acceding to a GNA request for arms and training is imperative to help restore order to the country (which they messed up in the first place). The GNA which Kerry supports holds the bulk of the Islamists which is in Tripoli; the rival secularist government is in Tobruk.

Kerry said that the U.S. government will now support for training and equipping the presidential guard and vetted forces (we all know what the word ‘vetted’ means) from throughout Libya as part of an aid package (we all know what aid means) that also is intended to help stop the flow of migrants and terrorists trying to reach Europe.

It is as one Arab commentator, Hisham Melhem puts it “It may be too late for Europe to raise its drawbridges, man the ramparts and enlarge the moat; fortified Europe is a thing of the past”.

In Europe, the Muslim enemy is already within, shipped by Turkey and Germany and are already living in small enclaves inside Europe and are familiar with Europe’s ways, habits and vulnerabilities. Installing new governments has now become the solution for ISIS which has doubled their numbers in Libya.

Anyone with a grain of logic can read the writing on the wall. The U.S. and the world powers (except Russia and China were not involved) are preparing the Middle East in creating a huge vaccum where some big new system must fill in the blank: a moderate Caliphate. Just use your urban dictionary to see who this is!

It’s not like we do not have enough mess to prepare for World War III. We live in strange times where the words of prophets resonate and where oxymorons have become the norm. Iran  has become an ‘enemy-ally’ of the U.S., the U.S. is supposedly fighting against ISIS, while it is also against Syria and Russia the arch-enemies of ISIS while it partners with Turkey. Never before do we see things being set up for Daniel 11 where the man of evil invaded Libya and Egypt as the waterways are crucial for his world commerce.

What Sykes Picot divided will soon want to unite to forge alliances between two major regional superpowers, Turkey and Iran. The West has created a mess from Syria, Iraq, to North Africa. Soon a mega alliance will form and if Al-Sisi of Egypt and Haftar of Libya refuse to comply, they will simply be invaded (See Daniel 11).


In March we wrote of a leaked memo which indicates the US lawmakers were personally briefed by King Abdullah in January about plans to create a mess in Libya. It is all about World War III warned the king. King Abdullah confirmed his country’s own special forces “will be imbedded [sic] with British SAS” in Libya. He told those present of the bigger mess they are creating:

“The problem is bigger than Isil [Islamic State], this is a third world war, this is Christians, Jews working with Muslims against outlaws.”

What we warned about in March is coming to fruition. King Abdullah gives a level of insight that westerners will never get from their own governments. Now the country will escalate to even a greater mess by creating more fractured governments. And the problem is much bigger. The memo indicates that Abdullah also told US lawmakers: The Turkish president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, “believes in a radical Islamic solution to the problems in the region” and the “fact that terrorists are going to Europe is part of Turkish policy, and Turkey keeps getting a slap on the hand, but they get off the hook”.

Is NATO heeding the king’s advice? No.

Buy why? Why does the West aid Islam while it ignores the king?

The West currently has a globalist mentality. But so does Islam. The two have this in common and they see a moderate global Islam as a partner to replace the extremist brand. It is the lesson we have been drilling for years and proving it over and over again in every story we post. Evil always starts with the abandonment of nationalism (reverse to babel) and ends by nationalism (aversion from Babel) and the reversion to nationalism was what brought the Islamic Caliphate as well as Communism to collapse. Now the West are aiding both by abandoning Christianity. It is experiencing what we have seen in socialist Russia and every other empire. It all starts in Genesis and ends in Genesis where the war is between the seed of the woman and the seed of satan where satan’s attempts are reversed and Babel retreats.

Keeping these principles is key to stop believing that a one world order will succeed. And today we see parts of Europe reverting to nationalism which will eventually defeat globalism’s European Union, while the Muslim is reverting back to Babel attempting a one world language, one world religion (Islam) and one world government (Sharia).

God’s refinement is by reversing the Babel effect where the two (reverse as in Euroskeptic and unite as in Eurocentric) are colliding together. The Euroskeptic results from the massive Muslim locust invasion and the falling away results in Eurocentric. The same we see in the U.S. with the growth of support for Donald Trump who is anti-globalism. The road to learn this hard lesson will be World War II, Armageddon. First as a result of the conflict between Eurocentric and Eurskeptic will cause the weakening of Europe where Turkey will invade Rome and hang their flags on St. Perter’s Basilica where this will spark the turnaround. Russia will interject and eventually their Cross will stomp Turkey’s crescent. Even the Russian Crucifix is prophetic. (I shall do a more extensive report on all of this for the next Sunday Special).


Bron: http://www.shoebat.com


Washington’s fake war on ISIS “moves” to Libya

April 26, 2016

Libya is one place the “Islamic State’s” sponsors believe Russia can’t get them…  

In 2011, a NATO coalition led by the United States used its own engineered regional campaign of political destabilization, the “Arab Spring,” as a pretext to militarily intervene in first Libya directly, and in a more indirect way, Syria. US and European forces also “quietly” intervened in several other nations, including Mali and the Ivory Coast amid this regional conflagration.

Even in 2011, it was clear to geopolitical analysts that military intervention in Libya was an attempt to divide and destroy the country, giving the US and its collaborators a base of operations to further disrupt and reorder the Middle East and North Africa region (MENA).

Almost immediately after US-led strikes on Libya coordinated with terrorist factions on the ground successfully overthrew the Libyan government, weapons and fighters were sent to Syria via NATO-member Turkey. CNN’s 2012 article, “Libya rebels move onto Syrian battlefield,” would report that:

Their war for freedom in Libya may be over, but almost a year after they won the battle for the Libyan capital, a group of fighters have a new battlefield: Syria. Under the command of one of Libya’s most well known rebel commanders, Al-Mahdi al-Harati, more than 30 Libyan fighters have made their way into Syria to support the Free Syrian Army rebels in their war against President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

It is difficult to believe CNN’s inaccuracy in its report was not intentional.

Far from a “war for freedom,” it is clear that Al-Mahdi al-Harati led just one of many proxy armies raised by the United States and its Persian Gulf allies.

The group espouses an extremist tinge propagated by US-ally Saudi Arabia, and in no way represents either the Libyan people, nor the people of Syria it claimed to be fighting on behalf of.

Al-Harati is now “mayor” of Tripoli, and is just one example which goes a long way in explaining the continuous chaos that has engulfed the country.

Quite literally, foreign-funded terrorists are running the country. Ironically, the same CNN that in 2012 celebrated the spreading “war for freedom,” would report in a more recent article titled, “ISIS fighters in Libya surge as group suffers setbacks in Syria, Iraq,” that:

There may now be up to 6,500 ISIS fighters in Libya, twice the number previously thought, according to several U.S. intelligence officials.  They attributed the increase to the U.S. analysis that ISIS is diverting more fighters to Libya from Syria — and from Turkey when they cannot get into Syria.

It is ironic because the so-called “Islamic State” (IS) is using precisely the same logistical, financial and political networks to flow back into Libya that CNN’s “freedom fighters” used to get to Syria in the first place.

In fact, it is quite clear Libya is simply reabsorbing the mercenary forces organized and sent to Syria in part through direct US-backing in the Libyan terror capital of Benghazi since late 2011 onward.

Why Washington Welcomes the IS Homecoming

Far from truly alarming to US and European special interests, IS arriving in the lawless warzone of what used to be the functional nation-state of Libya is a welcomed reprieve for what is essentially a Washington-London-Brussels mercenary army.

Syria is not only no longer safe for IS, it has become a grave in which IS is being buried alive.

This is thanks not to a successful anti-terror campaign waged by Washington and its allies, but by swift and successful operations carried out by Moscow, Tehran, and their allies in Damascus.

Indeed, with IS supply lines being cut from their source in Turkey and their forces being pushed back across Syrian territory, liquidation of their assets in Syria is well underway.

Likewise in Iraq, feigned US operations to stop IS have given way to an increase in cooperation between Baghdad, Tehran, and Damascus.

What started out as an attempt to divide and destroy Iran’s arc of influence across the region has galvanized it instead.

Moving the mercenary forces of IS out of the region is instrumental in ensuring they “live to fight another day.”

By placing them in Libya, Washington and its allies hope they will be far out of reach of the growing coalition truly fighting them across the Levant.

Further more, placing them in Libya allows other leftover “projects” from the “Arab Spring” to be revisited, such as the destabilization and destruction of Algeria, Tunisia and perhaps even another attempt to destabilize and destroy Egypt.

IS’ presence in Libya could also be used as a pretext for open-ended and much broader military intervention throughout all of Africa by US forces and their European and Persian Gulf allies.

As the US has done in Syria, where it has conducted operations for now over a year and a half to absolutely no avail, but has managed to prop up proxy forces and continue undermining and threatening targeted nations, it will likewise do so regarding IS in Libya and its inevitable and predictable spread beyond.

Despite endless pledges by the US and Europe to take on IS in Libya, neither has admitted they themselves and their actions in 2011 predictably precipitated IS’ rise there in the first place.

Despite the predictable danger destabilizing and destroying Libya posed to Europe, including a deluge of refugees fleeing North Africa to escape the war in Libya, predicted by many prominent analysts at the time even before the first of NATO’s bombs fell on the country, the US and Europe continued forward with military intervention anyway.

One can only surmise from this that the US and Europe sought to intentionally create this chaos, planning to fully exploit it both at home and abroad to continue its campaign to geopolitically reorder MENA.

Today, we watch what appears to be “ineffective” attempts to confront the growing threat the US and its allies intentionally created in Libya in the first place.

In reality, as Russia has proven in Syria, a decisive and relatively small military campaign can deal IS a deathblow.

The US and Europe are more than capable of executing such a military campaign, but is intentionally avoiding doing so.

This is not for a lack of political will, but rather because their collective political will instead seeks much wider chaos giving them carte blanche to act regionally with spanning, open-ended military interventions.


Bron: The Watchdog